Resources

Search, compare, and request quotes for nearly 13,000 products with detailed listings:

Blogs

  • 2012 IEEE PES Show Blog

    The IEEE Blog is a unique tour of the 2012 PES Expo in Orlando, FL, by Gene Wolf, former chairman of the IEEE PES T&D Committee.

White Papers

» More White Papers

Follow Power Editor Nikki Chandler on

Follow Technology Editor on Vito Longo

Find T&D World on Facebook

News Releases

Briefing Room

At the Briefing Room you will be able to stay up-to-date on the latest technology announcements where we will provide daily postings from our industry sources.

  
   

AEP Transmission Venture With Allegheny Receives Approval for Transmission Incentives From FERC

The Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline (PATH), American Electric Power's transmission joint venture with Allegheny Energy, has received approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for transmission incentives to help support construction of the approximately 290- mile, extra-high voltage transmission line from West Virginia into Maryland.

The joint venture filed a proposal for rate treatment with FERC Dec. 28, 2007. The companies requested and FERC granted four incentives for the project:

  • An incentive return on equity for new transmission of 14.3 percent. 
  • Recovery of a return on 100 percent of prudently incurred  transmission-related CWIP prior to the project's in-service date. 
  • Recovery of all startup business and administrative costs incurred  prior to the time the rates go into effect. 
  • Authorization to recover all prudently incurred development and  construction costs if the PATH project is abandoned as a result of  factors beyond the control of PATH or its parents.

As part of its decision, the commission set the requested formula rate for hearing and settlement judge procedures. The formula rate will go into effect March 1, 2008, subject to refund, pending the outcome of the hearing or settlement discussions.

"FERC's approval of incentives for PATH clearly recognizes the need for transmission investment in this region and the benefits PATH will provide. PATH addresses significant reliability concerns, including overloads that will occur on more than thirteen existing transmission lines in Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia and Pennsylvania as soon as 2012 if the line is not built," said Michael G. Morris, AEP chairman, president and chief executive officer. "Incentives for transmission projects recognize the diligence required to bring new transmission on line and the advanced technology necessary to enhance reliability. We need transmission investment, and incentives to encourage that investment, if our country is going to eliminate the weakest reliability areas, fully utilize existing generation and support development of renewable generation."

The PATH project includes approximately 244 miles of 765-kV extra-high voltage transmission from AEP's Amos substation near St. Albans, West Virginia, to Allegheny's Bedington substation, northeast of Martinsburg, West Virginia. Another 46 miles of twin-circuit 500-kV transmission will be constructed from Bedington to a new substation to be built near Kemptown, southeast of Frederick, Maryland. The total project is estimated to cost approximately $1.8 billion. AEP's estimated share of the project is approximately $600 million.

The PATH project will employ advanced transmission technologies to make it the most reliable, efficient and environmentally sensitive project possible. Extra-high voltage transmission inherently costs less and requires less land to carry the same amount of power than other transmission designs, and new 765-kV designs reduce line losses 40 percent over older designs. That means the PATH line will transport electricity more efficiently and reduce the power generation necessary to meet electricity demand. Additional advancements in 765-kV and 500-kV conductor designs and new control technologies in the project's substations also will enhance the reliability and efficiency of the PATH lines compared with other transmission lines.

PJM Interconnection, the regional transmission grid operator for a 13- state area, approved construction of PATH in June 2007 and identified June 2012 as the date by which the PATH project needs to be operational. The costs of the PATH project will be allocated to all electric utilities who serve retail customers in the PJM region.

AEP and Allegheny have begun work on routing studies and environmental assessments for the project. The companies anticipate seeking regulatory approvals for the project from the utility commissions in both West Virginia and Maryland in the fourth quarter of 2008, following the completion of the routing studies. AEP and Allegheny are committed to working with landowners, neighboring residents, business owners, affected communities and regulators to minimize the environmental and land-use impacts of the project.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2012 Penton Media Inc.


Acceptable Use Policy

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. T&D World will not edit postings. If T&D World editors deem any comment inappropriate, we will preempt or remove the posting.

General Rules: T&D World will not allow comments that are found to be degrading based on gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability. Neither will epithets, abusive language or obscene comments be allowed.

blog comments powered by Disqus

T&D TV

Most Read


Find Other Popular Items

Features

Vegetation Management
Grid Optimization

Upcoming Webcasts

Transmission & Distribution World allows you to access live and on-demand webcasts. Webcasts are available durning their scheduled date and time. If you are unable to attend at the scheduled time, these free events will be available On-Demand for viewing at your convenience.


On-Demand Webcasts

» View More Webcasts

Jobzone
  • Transmission & Distribution World April2012 Issue
  • Transmission & Distribution World March 2012 Issue
  • Transmission & Distribution World February 2012 Issue
  • January 2012 Issue
  • December 2011 Issue
  • November 2011 Issue
  • October 2011 Issue

Browse Back Issues