Resources

Search, compare, and request quotes for nearly 13,000 products with detailed listings:

Blogs

  • 2012 IEEE PES Show Blog

    The IEEE Blog is a unique tour of the 2012 PES Expo in Orlando, FL, by Gene Wolf, former chairman of the IEEE PES T&D Committee.

White Papers

» More White Papers

Follow Power Editor Nikki Chandler on

Follow Technology Editor on Vito Longo

Find T&D World on Facebook

News Releases

Briefing Room

At the Briefing Room you will be able to stay up-to-date on the latest technology announcements where we will provide daily postings from our industry sources.

  
   

FERC Rejects Market Power Mitigation Proposal in Duke-Progress Merger

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has rejected Duke Energy Corp. and Progress Energy, Inc.’s proposed mitigation plan to remedy their merger’s harmful effects on competition, saying it cannot unconditionally approve the merger until the applicants remedy the harmful effects on competition previously identified by FERC.

On Sept. 30, 2011, FERC conditionally authorized the proposed merger. In that order, FERC found that although the applicants failed the market power screens established in FERC’s 1996 Merger Policy Statement and related regulations in some seasons because their post-merger market power concentration in the Carolinas would rise to unacceptable levels, the applicants could proceed with the merger provided they propose, and FERC approve, mitigation measures sufficient to remedy these harmful effects.

The order concludes that the mitigation proposal, filed on Oct. 17, 2011, does not remedy the harmful effects because:

  • The supporting analysis for the mitigation proposal is flawed and does not demonstrate that the mitigation proposal would remedy the market power screen failures identified in the September order.
  • The mitigation proposal does not eliminate the opportunity for the merged company to act anti-competitively. Although Duke and Progress describe the proposal as a virtual divestiture, it would not transfer control of the energy the applicants propose to sell from the merged company.
  • The independent monitor proposal would not provide sufficient oversight of the applicants’ compliance with the mitigation proposal.

The order does not reject the merger. It remains conditionally authorized by FERC. The companies may offer another mitigation proposal that addresses FERC’s concerns.

In a related order, FERC rejected the companies’ joint dispatch agreement and joint open access transmission tariff. Because those filings are predicated on the merger application, FERC said action is not appropriate at this time. The rejection is without prejudice to the applicants re-filing.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2012 Penton Media Inc.


Acceptable Use Policy

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. T&D World will not edit postings. If T&D World editors deem any comment inappropriate, we will preempt or remove the posting.

General Rules: T&D World will not allow comments that are found to be degrading based on gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability. Neither will epithets, abusive language or obscene comments be allowed.

blog comments powered by Disqus

T&D TV

Most Read


Find Other Popular Items

Features

Vegetation Management
Grid Optimization

Upcoming Webcasts

Transmission & Distribution World allows you to access live and on-demand webcasts. Webcasts are available durning their scheduled date and time. If you are unable to attend at the scheduled time, these free events will be available On-Demand for viewing at your convenience.


On-Demand Webcasts

» View More Webcasts

Jobzone
  • Transmission & Distribution World April2012 Issue
  • Transmission & Distribution World March 2012 Issue
  • Transmission & Distribution World February 2012 Issue
  • January 2012 Issue
  • December 2011 Issue
  • November 2011 Issue
  • October 2011 Issue

Browse Back Issues