Resources

Search, compare, and request quotes for nearly 13,000 products with detailed listings:

Blogs

  • 2012 IEEE PES Show Blog

    The IEEE Blog is a unique tour of the 2012 PES Expo in Orlando, FL, by Gene Wolf, former chairman of the IEEE PES T&D Committee.

White Papers

» More White Papers

Follow Power Editor Nikki Chandler on

Follow Technology Editor on Vito Longo

Find T&D World on Facebook

News Releases

Briefing Room

At the Briefing Room you will be able to stay up-to-date on the latest technology announcements where we will provide daily postings from our industry sources.

  
   

FERC Grants Partial Rate Incentive Requests for Transmission Projects

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) last week approved transmission incentive requests for two projects that will improve reliability of the nation’s interstate transmission system: a 1,000-mile transmission line that will bring renewable energy from Canada to California and a project that will help relieve congestion in the Mid-Atlantic area.

FERC partially approved Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s (PG&E) petition for a declaratory order for recovery of prudently incurred pre-commercial and abandonment costs related to a proposal that would deliver up to 3,000 megawatts of new renewable power from British Columbia, Canada, and the Pacific Northwest to California (EL08-24).

In a separate case, FERC granted certain transmission rate incentives for a proposed nearly $1 billion transmission project in the Mid-Atlantic region (EL08-23). The PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Public Service Electric and Gas Company project, designated the Susquehanna Line, will span 130 miles across northeastern Pennsylvania to northern New Jersey. The PJM Interconnection LLC, the regional transmission operator for the Mid-Atlantic region, called this project a “baseline project” in its 2007 Regional Transmission Expansion Plan.

“These two proposals are exceptional in size, financial commitment and potential benefits for consumers,” FERC Chairman Joseph T. Kelliher said. “The actions we take today will help reduce congestion and ensure reliability in two regions of the country with rising electric power needs and limited transmission resources to efficiently deliver the power to customers.”

Commissioner Marc Spitzer agreed. “These orders show we are prepared to exercise the authority Congress granted to FERC in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to encourage greater investment in the power grid,” he said. “Our policies are making a difference – major backbone transmission projects are being proposed and built throughout our nation.”

FERC gave partial approval to PG&E’s request based on its authority to grant incentives that promote particular policy objectives. In this case, the PG&E project is multi-regional and international, and its size, scope and complexity is such that many companies would be unwilling and unable to spend money to determine whether the project would ensure reliability or reduce congestion. “There is significant policy objective in encouraging companies to explore new ways of finding and delivering renewable resources,” FERC said.

But given the early stage of the proposed $3.2 billion project, it is not yet time to address PG&E’s request for construction-work-in-progress (CWIP) and return on equity (ROE) incentives, so FERC deferred a decision on these issues. The Commission suggested PG&E resubmit its request for any additional appropriate infrastructure incentives under Order No. 679 once the utility completes studies that will determine if the project meets FERC standards for infrastructure incentives.

In the Susquehanna Line order, FERC approved a 1.25 percent ROE adder, a reduction from the 1.50 percent that was requested; a one-half percent adder to each utility’s base ROE for continued membership in PJM; a 100 percent recovery of prudently incurred expenses for CWIP to be included in rate base; abandonment incentives; and authority to transfer certain incentives to as-yet unidentified affiliates.

In approving most of what the companies had requested, FERC noted that the project sponsors “face significant risks and challenges in constructing the Susquehanna Line.” By granting the incentives, investors will be encouraged “to invest in a transmission project with substantial financial risks…”

FERC Order No. 679 requires an applicant seeking transmission incentives to demonstrate that the facilities it proposes either ensure reliability or reduce the cost of delivered power by reducing transmission congestion. Order No. 679 implements section 1241 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct). EPAct added a new section 219 to the Federal Power Act directing FERC to establish incentive-based rate treatments for transmission investment.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2012 Penton Media Inc.


Acceptable Use Policy

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. T&D World will not edit postings. If T&D World editors deem any comment inappropriate, we will preempt or remove the posting.

General Rules: T&D World will not allow comments that are found to be degrading based on gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability. Neither will epithets, abusive language or obscene comments be allowed.

blog comments powered by Disqus

T&D TV

Most Read


Find Other Popular Items

Features

Vegetation Management
Grid Optimization

Upcoming Webcasts

Transmission & Distribution World allows you to access live and on-demand webcasts. Webcasts are available durning their scheduled date and time. If you are unable to attend at the scheduled time, these free events will be available On-Demand for viewing at your convenience.


On-Demand Webcasts

» View More Webcasts

Jobzone
  • Transmission & Distribution World April2012 Issue
  • Transmission & Distribution World March 2012 Issue
  • Transmission & Distribution World February 2012 Issue
  • January 2012 Issue
  • December 2011 Issue
  • November 2011 Issue
  • October 2011 Issue

Browse Back Issues