Resources

Search, compare, and request quotes for nearly 13,000 products with detailed listings:

Blogs

  • 2012 IEEE PES Show Blog

    The IEEE Blog is a unique tour of the 2012 PES Expo in Orlando, FL, by Gene Wolf, former chairman of the IEEE PES T&D Committee.

White Papers

» More White Papers

Follow Power Editor Nikki Chandler on

Follow Technology Editor on Vito Longo

Find T&D World on Facebook

News Releases

Briefing Room

At the Briefing Room you will be able to stay up-to-date on the latest technology announcements where we will provide daily postings from our industry sources.

  
   

Gap in Electricity Prices For Industrial Customers Between Deregulated and Regulated States Has Tripled Since 1999

Industrial electricity customers who had hoped deregulation would bring them lower electricity prices have instead seen rising prices and a widening price gap between them and their counterparts in regulated states, according to a study released today by Power in the Public Interest. The price gap has tripled since 1999, and today industrial customers in deregulated states pay roughly $7.2 billion more annually for their power than their counterparts in regulated states would pay for the same amount of energy, according to the PPI study

“This gap in purchasing power explains why industrial customers are hurting as they try to compete with their counterparts in regulated states,” said PPI's executive director, Marilyn Showalter. “Deregulation is not responsible for the entire gap, but the so-called competitive electricity markets aren’t good for competitiveness,” she observed.

Eleven states (California, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Texas) and the District of Columbia have deregulated electricity prices and their consumers are subject to market prices. In addition Montana deregulated industrial (but not residential) prices for the period analyzed in the study; it is now returning to a regulated model.

The PPI study, based on Energy Department data, reveals that the gap in prices between the deregulated and regulated states has dramatically widened since 1999, when deregulation began to unfold. Prices in the collective deregulated states have increased in real dollars, increased as a percent of the national average, and increased as a percent of the price in regulated states.

Key findings include:

- The gap in industrial retail electricity prices between the deregulated and regulated states has roughly tripled since 1999—from a gap of 1.09 cents/kwh in 1999 to a gap of 3.08 cents/kwh in 2007. In 1999, the average price per kwh for industrial customers in the now deregulated states was 5.23 cents, compared to 4.14 cents in the regulated states. In 2007, the average price for the deregulated states is 8.60 cents, compared to 5.52 in the regulated states.

- In 1999, industrial customers in the now-deregulated states paid $3.7 billion more for electricity (in 2006 dollars) than they would have paid, had they been able to purchase power at the regulated states’ average price; today they pay $7.2 billion more than they would pay if they could purchase at the regulated states’ average price. The eight-year (2000-2007) cumulative value of this gap in purchasing power, if the money were invested at a real rate of return, is $55 billion.

- Since 1999, prices for industrial customers in deregulated states have gone from 18% above to 37% above the national average, while prices for industrial customers in regulated states have gone from 7% below to 12% below the national average. So the spread between the two prices has increased from 25 to 49 percentage points.

- Comparing the two groups directly to each other, since 1999, deregulated industrial prices have gone from 26% higher to 56% higher than regulated prices.

- Of the top ten states ranked according to largest incremental increase in industrial price since 1999, all are deregulated states (except Hawaii and Alaska). They are: Maryland, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Washington, D.C., Maine, Rhode Island, New York and Texas.

The main culprit behind the price gap is the wholesale market designs used by regional transmission organizations, Showalter said. In RTOs, the most expensive supply, often a natural gas plant, sets the price for all needed supplies, regardless of the underlying cost. In regulated, cost-based systems, a higher-cost resource will not significantly affect the amount consumers must pay for a lower-cost resource, Showalter said.

The study analyzed the latest data available from the U. S. Energy Information Administration, Department of Energy, through July 2007, for total delivered price (for generation, transmission, and distribution) to all industrial customers in a state. It measured prices for the 12 months ending in July of each year, through July 2007. Figure 9 from the study shows price trends in real (2006) dollars. It shows that from 1991 through the 12 months ending July 2000 (before deregulation took hold), real prices trended down for both groups. Since then, however, real prices for the deregulated group have risen dramatically, whereas real prices in the regulated group have risen quite modestly.

Though the study focused on industrial customers, it also reported on prices for all customers (residential, commercial and industrial). For the total group, the gap in retail electricity prices between deregulated and regulated states has more than doubled—from 2.1 cents/kwh in 1999 to 4.3 cents/kwh in 2007. The eight-year cumulative value of the gap in prices between regulated and deregulated states, invested in a real return of 5 percent, is $337 billion, in 2006 dollars.

Power in the Public Interest was formed by utilities and utility-organizations interested in promoting state, regional, and federal electricity policies that secure for consumers a reliable, affordable, and durable electricity system.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2012 Penton Media Inc.


Acceptable Use Policy

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. T&D World will not edit postings. If T&D World editors deem any comment inappropriate, we will preempt or remove the posting.

General Rules: T&D World will not allow comments that are found to be degrading based on gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability. Neither will epithets, abusive language or obscene comments be allowed.

blog comments powered by Disqus

T&D TV

Most Read


Find Other Popular Items

Features

Vegetation Management
Grid Optimization

Upcoming Webcasts

Transmission & Distribution World allows you to access live and on-demand webcasts. Webcasts are available durning their scheduled date and time. If you are unable to attend at the scheduled time, these free events will be available On-Demand for viewing at your convenience.


On-Demand Webcasts

» View More Webcasts

Jobzone
  • Transmission & Distribution World April2012 Issue
  • Transmission & Distribution World March 2012 Issue
  • Transmission & Distribution World February 2012 Issue
  • January 2012 Issue
  • December 2011 Issue
  • November 2011 Issue
  • October 2011 Issue

Browse Back Issues