Business Customers' Satisfaction of Electric Utilities Increases Notably
Overall business customer satisfaction with electric utility companies has improved notably from 2011, but satisfaction among businesses with the smallest monthly average electric bills trails behind that of businesses that spend more, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2012 Electric Utility Business Customer Satisfaction Study.
The study is based on interviews with representatives of more than 24,300 U.S. businesses that spend more than $250 monthly on electricity. More than 90 utility brands serving a total of more than 11.7 million business customers are included in the study. Overall customer satisfaction is measured by examining six factors: power quality and reliability; billing and payment; corporate citizenship; price; communications; and customer service.
Overall satisfaction among business customers averages 657 on a 1,000-point scale in 2012, an improvement of 15 points from 2011. While satisfaction has improved in all six factors, the greatest gains have occurred in customer service, corporate citizenship and billing and payment.
"Utilities have invested in improving their websites, online bill formats, and business service call centers, which has led to an impressive increase in overall satisfaction," said John Hazen, senior director of the energy utility practice at J.D. Power and Associates. "Customers contacted their utility company by phone and online more frequently in 2012 than in 2011, but utilities still managed to raise satisfaction with customer service despite the increased volume."
While overall satisfaction among business customers has improved in 2012, there are distinct differences in satisfaction between businesses, based on their monthly bill amounts. The study finds that overall satisfaction is highest (averaging 666) among businesses that spend at least $50,000 monthly on electricity. Satisfaction among businesses that spend between $500 and $49,000 each month averages just two points lower—664. However, satisfaction among businesses that spend between $250 and $499 each month on electricity is considerably lower—645, on average.
"Utilities already do a good job of understanding the needs and preferences of larger businesses, and have adapted their communications and operations to best suit the needs of these customers," said Hazen. "However, there is an opportunity to focus on satisfying smaller businesses. This may include reinforcing awareness of energy conservation programs and providing customized business contact."
Within each geographic region included in the study, utility providers are classified into one of two segments: large (serving 85,000 or more business customers) and midsize (serving between 25,000 and 84,999 business customers). Rankings within each region and segment are as follows:
East Region
Jersey Central Power & Light ranks highest among large electric
utility providers in the East Region. Among midsize electric utilities
in the East Region, Central Maine Power ranks highest.
Midwest Region
In the Midwest Region, MidAmerican Energy ranks highest among large
electric utilities and receives an award for a second consecutive year,
while Omaha Public Power District ranks highest among midsize brands.
South Region
Alabama Power ranks highest among large utilities in the South
Region for a second consecutive year. Among midsize electric utilities,
CPS Energy ranks highest.
West Region
For a third consecutive year, SRP (Salt River Project) ranks highest
among large electric utilities in the West Region. Among midsize
electric utility providers, Idaho Power and SMUD (Sacramento Municipal
Utility District) rank highest in a tie.
The study also finds that 16 percent of customers in 2012 indicate they have a smart meter installed at their business. Satisfaction among customers whose businesses have a smart meter installed averages 85 points higher than among business customers without a smart meter (734 vs. 649, respectively). In addition, among business customers who indicate they are not aware of their utility's smart meter or smart grid efforts, satisfaction averages 630. In comparison, satisfaction averages 709 among customers who say they are aware of their utility's smart meter and smart grid efforts.
The 2012 Electric Utility Business Customer Satisfaction Study is based on responses from 24,385 online interviews with business customers of the 95 largest utility brands across the United States. The study was fielded from May to August 2011 and September to December 2011.
|
Customer Satisfaction Index Scores |
|
|
(Based on a 1,000-point scale) |
|
|
|
|
|
East Region: Large Segment |
|
|
Jersey Central Power & Light |
670 |
|
PPL Electric Utilities |
666 |
|
Con Edison |
654 |
|
PSE&G |
646 |
|
National Grid |
641 |
|
East Region Large Segment Average |
639 |
|
PECO |
638 |
|
BGE |
636 |
|
NYSEG |
634 |
|
NSTAR |
625 |
|
Connecticut Light & Power |
611 |
|
Long Island Power Authority |
606 |
|
Appalachian Power |
601 |
|
|
|
|
East Region: Midsize Segment |
|
|
Central Maine Power |
667 |
|
Met-Ed |
660 |
|
Atlantic City Electric |
654 |
|
Rochester Gas & Electric |
654 |
|
Delmarva Power |
652 |
|
West Penn Power |
639 |
|
Penelec |
638 |
|
East Region Midsize Segment Average |
636 |
|
Duquesne Light |
633 |
|
Potomac Edison |
628 |
|
Public Service of New Hampshire |
626 |
|
Central Hudson Gas & Electric |
625 |
|
United Illuminating |
610 |
|
Orange & Rockland |
600 |
|
Pepco |
590 |
|
NOTE: Mon Power is included in the study, but not ranked due to insufficient sample size. |
|
|
|
|
|
Midwest Region: Large Segment |
|
|
MidAmerican Energy |
707 |
|
Xcel Energy-Midwest |
682 |
|
AEP Ohio |
669 |
|
We Energies |
669 |
|
Alliant Energy |
668 |
|
Kentucky Utilities |
664 |
|
KCP&L |
659 |
|
Duke Energy-Midwest |
658 |
|
Ameren Missouri |
655 |
|
Midwest Region Large Segment Average |
654 |
|
Ohio Edison |
646 |
|
ComEd |
642 |
|
Consumers Energy |
639 |
|
Detroit Edison |
636 |
|
Ameren Illinois |
610 |
|
|
|
|
Midwest Region: Midsize Segment |
|
|
Omaha Public Power District |
731 |
|
Wisconsin Public Service |
684 |
|
Westar Energy |
657 |
|
Midwest Region Midsize Segment Average |
656 |
|
Indianapolis Power & Light |
655 |
|
Dayton Power & Light |
646 |
|
Indiana Michigan Power |
646 |
|
NIPSCO |
645 |
|
The Illuminating Company |
641 |
|
Louisville Gas & Electric |
638 |
|
Toledo Edison |
627 |
|
|
|
|
South Region: Large Segment |
|
|
Alabama Power |
705 |
|
South Carolina Electric & Gas |
687 |
|
Duke Energy-Carolinas |
680 |
|
Georgia Power |
679 |
|
Progress Energy Carolinas |
675 |
|
South Region Large Segment Average |
673 |
|
Dominion Virginia Power |
668 |
|
Florida Power & Light |
668 |
|
OG&E |
664 |
|
Entergy Louisiana |
661 |
|
Entergy Arkansas |
654 |
|
Progress Energy Florida |
641 |
|
|
|
|
South Region: Midsize Segment |
|
|
CPS Energy |
690 |
|
Southwestern Electric Power |
689 |
|
Entergy Mississippi |
680 |
|
Entergy Texas |
672 |
|
Mississippi Power |
671 |
|
OUC |
670 |
|
Austin Energy |
667 |
|
Public Service Co. of Oklahoma |
659 |
|
Tampa Electric |
659 |
|
South Region Midsize Segment Average |
659 |
|
Gulf Power |
646 |
|
NES |
634 |
|
JEA |
602 |
|
MLGW |
585 |
|
Included in the study but not ranked due to insufficient sample size are: Cleco Power, Santee Cooper and |
|
|
|
|
|
West Region: Large Segment |
|
|
SRP |
741 |
|
Portland General Electric |
703 |
|
APS |
697 |
|
Rocky Mountain Power |
682 |
|
Southern California Edison |
679 |
|
West Region Large Segment Average |
665 |
|
San Diego Gas & Electric |
661 |
|
Puget Sound Energy |
660 |
|
Pacific Power |
654 |
|
Xcel Energy-West |
651 |
|
NV Energy |
649 |
|
Pacific Gas and Electric |
648 |
|
L.A. Dept. of Water & Power |
626 |
|
|
|
|
West Region: Midsize Segment |
|
|
Idaho Power |
707 |
|
SMUD |
707 |
|
Snohomish County PUD |
704 |
|
Seattle City Light |
694 |
|
Tucson Electric Power |
694 |
|
West Region Midsize Segment |
677 |
|
Avista |
665 |
|
NorthWestern Energy |
649 |
|
PNM |
639 |
|
El Paso Electric |
635 |
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2012 Penton Media Inc.
Acceptable Use Policy
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. T&D World will not edit postings. If T&D World editors deem any comment inappropriate, we will preempt or remove the posting.
General Rules: T&D World will not allow comments that are found to be degrading based on gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability. Neither will epithets, abusive language or obscene comments be allowed.
blog comments powered by Disqus
















